Loading

Welcome to the Comedy-Recycling (C-R) Theory.  Some of the graphics have been revised for appearance on the web, rather than to save this cheapskate's inkjet printer cartridges.  There are new ideas for 2006 and 2007, the differences with standard theories, new claims, interesting new ideas about the "gravitational constant(?) – g" are included for the first time, and the old claims are also included at the beginning.  Links to each section will be updated as my time permits.

Many thanks to those who have written in.  Your comments and questions are welcome.

This theory has already been laughed at by scientists (and other professionals) from around the world, sometimes intentionally.

Note: This version is NOT intended for direct translation, and includes deliberately incorrect word-usage, for added humor.

For international readers, for whom the English language is not their native tongue, I am working on "The Completely Recycling Theory" (of the entire known universe) in addition to the Comedy-Recycling theory.  A sneak-preview of this version features humor free text, simplified language, elimination of slang, contractions, and idioms. It may be posted on-line when this revised version replaces the earlier text.  This version is suitable for linear translation.

A very brief background on the Comedy-Recycling theory:

Back in late 1978-early 1979, I was wondering how gravity still emanated from a black hole.  In my quest to uncover a reasonable answer, I stumbled over an idea from Einstein, which had been "hidden in plain sight" for many years.  He said that matter bent or curved spacetime, and warped spacetime told matter how to move.

The curvature concept is similar to a person jumping onto a trampoline, changing the shape of a grid of squares drawn on the unstretched surface.  One could also think-of a grid, drawn on the surface of a loosely-filled water balloon.  Push down a dulled pencil lightly, to change the shape (curvature) of the balloon's surface.

I noticed that in both cases, the curvature (shape of the surface) changed with respect to the amount of the weight or pressure placed upon either the trampoline or the balloon. NOTE: Once changed, NO additional energy (or action) was continually needed to maintain the curvature unless the shape changed in response to say—a jumping person or pushing the pencil down or pulling it up.   Note also: even if the pencil is rotated or was constantly spinning, the curvature's shape would not change with time.

This suggested to me that curvature, a geometric effect, would still be present outside a black hole, WITHOUT NEEDING either electromagnetic energy or gravitons, (hypothetical carriers of the gravitational force) to travel at (or above) the speed of light.   This concept nicely answered my original question, "Why is gravity still felt outside the black hole?" Closer examination of this concept of "curvature" causing the effect of "gravity" led me to discover (or uncover) many remarkable NEW ideas.

Next: If you, the reader, note the effect of an increase of curvature (squeezing) on half of a juicy orange, you will detect an increase in fluids emitted with every increase in pressure applied, up to a point.  There will come a time when absolutely no more fluid (orange juice) can be squeezed-out.

Let us now consider the effect of gravity upon matter.   Notice that as matter falls into greater curvature, kinetic energy (speed) is released, until the matter hits something or is prevented from falling further.   The suggestion here is: increasing "gravitational" curvature forces-out some energy contained in all matter.   The kinetic energy has come-out, only from a decrease in the overall energy-content of the matter.  This energy is in DIRECT proportion to the decrease in real-time, and the increase in curvature.  In the simplest words, matter has decreased it's energy, in real-time by the exact amount equal to the same amount of kinetic energy (speed) released.  [This kinetic energy would have been converted to heat if the matter had hit something or gone splat.]

E _b4=m _b4 (c _b4)² = [ m _after (c _after)² ]+ kinetic energy released

Note: Either the quantity of mass-m or the quantity of the speed-of-light-c will decrease slightly with the slow-down of time, to make-up the difference.  Presently, we do not have sophisticated enough measuring tools to measure these minuscule changes.The changes would be more substantial if we could travel to a different location, either the Great Attractor, or near the outer edges of the universe.

 

Newly claimed, revised in 2007, while in greater curvature, the same matter in stronger gravity has less energy.  This difference in energy IS EXACTLY the same amount as:

[the change in real-time] .[(the mass) .(c)²].

In the simplest concept, 1 Kg of lead (matter) at the outer edges of the universe is worth less total energy than the same mass transported to here, on earth.  The exact energy difference would be the amount of energy one would expend to move the matter from point A to point B.

The difference in real-time, at the outer edges of the universe, and the real-time, here, on earth, will be EXACTLY the same energy (gravitationally) added, to "lift" the matter from there to here. NOTE: Gravity did NOT produce the energy, rather, the change in gravitational curvature changed the "ability" of matter to "store" energy while in a certain time-frame. [Similar to adjusting the width of plates confining a sponge to adjust its absorbing capacity.]

Also revised for 2007, the same 1 Kg of lead would be worth even more energy at the "Great Attractor".Notice: "gravity" never needs to keep track of the energy-content of each mass. Rather, each "mass" takes it's own energy with it. [Something like: a car traveling with it's gas tank changing between empty and full.]

Contrary to one assumption from the theory of relativity, there IS a "preferred" reference frame imposed over this entire universe, by gravity (actually, by the curvature).  When we see a highly-red-shifted object near the edges of the universe, that object really IS ACTUALLY as it appears to us.  It is slowed-down (time-wise) significantly as compared to us.  Similarly, an object at the "Great Attractor" is actually more energetic, existing in a faster timeframe, and it is blue-shifted as compared to us here on earth.

Significantly, any photon emitted from an object near the outer edges of the universe DOES NOT (continuously) CHANGE it's energy level when traveling towards earth.  Rather, our "time-frame" here on earth IS significantly faster.  When we measure the photon from "there", it does not measure the same as a photon emitted "here".

Simply, this means that there is an overall reference frame superimposed over everything in this universe!!  This also means that the space we SEE is not isotropic, or the same in all directions.And that IS WHAT we actually SEE.

AFTER correcting the observed red-shifts, science claims there is NO DIFFERENCE in what we SEE at a distance.  I am reminded of the Chico Marx quote: "Who you gonna believe, me" (the theory of relativity) "or your own two eyes?" (The author's addition in parenthesis and italics for the analogy.) Sadly, science has chosen to believe the theory of relativity, instead of the observed VISUAL EVIDENCE, as seen in plain sight.

This also means that: our universe is NOT expanding, and is NOT expanding at an Expanding rate, either.  Rather, the experiments done to come to that conclusion were flawed significantly in ONE underlying assumption.  The experiment(ers) assumed that "there" was the same as "here", time-wise.

I would predict (without yet having done the math or analyzed the specific data) if the cepheid variable study was re-analyzed, with the time factor restored, and not corrected (and not interpreted as acceleration away from us), the data will fit fine with a relatively "static" universe.

A significant note: Conventional gravity theories can't prevent the universe from collapsing, there is no preventive measure to forbid it.  Using the Comedy-Recycling theory, one can easily see that, matter at the outer edges of the universe IS ALREADY at a lower energy state than it would be HERE on earth.  Astoundingly, the matter there would have to GAIN energy to COLLAPSE inward.

By noticing the features observed in OUR universe, the C-R theory used those features as a "laboratory model" of the only "Inside of a Black-Hole ^C-R " we (humanity) will probably ever get to explore.  All properties attributed to the insides of all Black-Holes ^C-R were derived from observing our universe, with the exception of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  The concept of the Neutral Zone ^C-R has been derived from other simple ideas common to several real world phenomena.

New terms used in the C-R theory are: Black-Hole ^C-R : This double capitalized, hyphenated, and post-superscripted "Brand Name" Black-Hole ^C-R is used to denote C-R theory obeying black holes.  Conventional black holes DO NOT EXIST as described, and will be referred to only for discussion or ridicule purposes.  All properties described will be more extensively covered in the claims section, in the Extended Definitions sections, and in areas of the theory listed.

C-R theory Black-Holes ^C-R cannot collapse into a singularity.  All Black-Holes ^C-R must have an EXACTLY critical, fully enclosed Active Zone ^C-R at their center.  Gravitational curvature at the exact center of each Black-Hole ^C-R is always minimum.

Any Black-Hole ^C-R which has swallowed matter or energy will store these in a volume the C-R theory calls the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  This Neutral Zone ^C-R is the real heart of the Black-Hole ^C-R.  No energy needs to be expended or radiated to maintain the strength of "gravity" (which is actually the gravitational curvature) outside the Black-Hole ^C-R.  All matter swallowed by the Black-Hole ^C-R then stored in the Neutral Zone ^C-R is totally inactive.  It is forbidden to interact, radiate, decay, or communicate in any way with other matter or with energy as long as it remains in the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  The Black-Hole ^C-R seizes, sorts and consumes sub-atomic matter predominantly by mass. (Imagine that!!)  Most electrons manage to escape consumption after the proton or proton-neutron rich nucleus passes through, into the IB ³ Schwarzschild radius.

Note: Every active, matter eating Black-Hole ^C-R is storing-up and concentrating, in an inactivated state, the ONLY KNOWN force which can OVERCOME GRAVITY in real world situations.  Simply stated, the Neutral Zone ^C-R is filled with inactivated, self-repelling excess protons (positive charges).

After the Neutral Zone ^C-R has stored-up excess protons for a long time, a process not unlike cranking a child's Jack-in-the-box to "free" the Jack will occur.  These anti-Black-Hole ^C-R events can range, in an order of increasing magnitude, a nova, a supernova, a hypernova, a Seyfert galaxy, a quasar, a gamma ray burst (GRB), and I used-to think, the big bang.

Active Zone ^C-R: The Active Zone ^C-R is a necessary part of the inside of every Black-Hole ^C-R.  In the Active Zone ^C-R all speed-of-light interactions are permitted (unlike the Neutral Zone ^C-R).  Technically, outside of all known Black-Holes ^C-R, our universe exists.  It also appears to be an inside Active Zone ^C-R.  All "speed-of-light critical" interactions and activities are permitted within an Active Zone ^C-R.  The inside Active Zone ^C-R could also be considered a placeholder to help prevent the Black-Hole ^C-R from collapsing into a singularity.

IB ³-Schwarzschild radius: Starting in 2006, the C-R theory has added the term IB³ to the front of the term Schwarzschild radius. The IB³ term is short for 3 extra properties the C-R theory adds: Isolation Boundary, Insulation Boundary, and Information Boundary.

Although conventional theories also use the term Schwarzschild radius, the C-R theory adds the following concepts: There is always a complete Active Zone ^C-R inside every Schwarzschild radius, and there is also an outer Schwarzschild radius at the outside of each Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Between the 2 Schwarzschild radii all matter and energy is stored-up in a time frozen, inactivated state.  Somewhat akin to matter stored at absolute zero—temperature wise, matter inside the Neutral Zone ^C-R is, energy-wise, at it's lowest possible state.  It will be inactive, infinitely electrically insulated, and informationally isolated from other matter and energy there in the Neutral Zone ^C-R, and any matter and energy anywhere else.

All "speed-of-light" interaction, communication, exchanges, and knowledge is forbidden, or more accurately, turned-off, and inactivated.  The only exception is the curvature contributed by the total mass: the sum of mass from the Neutral Zone ^C-R plus the mass from the Active Zone ^C-R inside.  The momentum of the total Black-Hole ^C-R might be measurable from the outside, but would require tools beyond our present visual capabilities to be precise.

Neutral Zone ^C-R: This Neutral Zone ^C-R concept was discussed somewhat in the terms above, but briefly represents any volume of space where the gravitational escape velocity exceeds the speed-of-light.  There is no possible collapse into a singularity.

The Neutral Zone ^C-R is to gravity what absolute zero is to temperature.  The minimum-energy possible state of existence.  No additional energy can be extracted, by any means, ever!!!!  The energy-content can only increase later, someday when the curvature goes back below the escape velocity of the speed-of-light, then energy can be added.  Matter cannot absorb any energy while matter resides is in the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Quite interestingly, time-trapped energy (as photons) can exist within the Neutral Zone ^C-R, but they still cannot interact in any way.  Forget despair and hopelessness, though.  The very properties of the Neutral Zone ^C-R are a KEY concept of the C-R theory in the practical recycling of matter and energy in the universe!!!

The ability of Black-Holes ^C-R to recycle will be further covered in the upcoming chapters, and many of the unexpected but unique interconnections using THE EXISTING properties of the matter and energy within this universe will be explored more thoroughly.

I do apologize in advance that the C-R theory does not agree with many of the almost universally accepted concepts common to conventional theories.  Most of the older C-R theory readers will never be able to change their viewpoint enough to fully appreciate the advantages gained using the Comedy-Recycling theory.

I have designed this presentation to appeal mostly to those younger individuals who have not yet made up their minds that "it can not be done that way". [Not primarily for the academic professionals who have been teaching the opposite (conventional) ideas for so long because they were taught that way, and they now believe those ideas fundamentally.]

I could not write the C-R theory "believed" [not just believable, but already accepted as fact], so I wrote it funny.

I would suggest, for the average reader, do not try to believe this theory upon your first reading! Read it as you would read a fake, a fable, a fairy-tale, a fantasy, a (science) fiction.  This will free-up your natural inclination to think: "This is not what I have been taught"! My hope is that, given 5 or 10 years into the future, after rejecting these ideas, some of those who have read this theory will be continually amazed, as I have been the last 28 years, of the incredibly easy "real-world-fit" this theory seems to have.

The abundance, in this universe, of high-energy positive charges (cosmic rays), excess electrons flowing from the sun, through earth, into space (1,000,000+ amps) in the Aurora, the multiple positive-ionizations found in the ejecta of the supernova, quasar, and Seyfert galaxy remnants, the complete ionization of the outer 1/5 of this universe's shell of the hydrogen atoms (as ions), and the presence of polarized light (in almost every direction), indicating enormous current flows (or magnetic fields), ALL take on a simplicity, from a set of causes unique to ONLY the C-R theory.  A natural cause for the appearance of "The Great Attractor", and what it means is also easily explained by the C-R theory.

I welcome any reader to put this theory to every imaginable test, in every imaginable scenario. Please let me know if you find any phenomenon, or any experimental result which would seem to invalidate any part of this theory.

Note: There may be some interpretations of the raw data, the experimenters "spin" on the view of what was seen or detected, that may be presented in such a way that the conclusions from that view disagree with the C-R theory's view.

Some "easy" potential experiments to test the C-R theory will be covered later on in the appendix, and in one of the chapters.

Note: I said easy, not QUICK, not CHEAP, and not necessarily with today's technology and limitations.  There may be one unexpected aspect of gravity's behavior which can be tested within 20 years or more, with existing technology.

I would like to start including some reader's letters and comments near the end of the web-site.  I will not include anything unless you specifically state in your letters or e-mails that you don't mind if I post the results.

Note: I may edit the letters or questions for clarity, brevity, and language. I will attempt to credit any responders in first-in, first credited, and I will try to be fair to anyone who disagrees with me.

I started out not believing any of the C-R theory views at first, but slowly "adopted" the C-R theory concepts as my own, after they made sense to me.  I am still making new discoveries from the C-R theory.  I am still changing and adapting my old beliefs, and adopting a more "pro-C-R theory" viewpoint.  If I do detect, or suspect that I am not on track, or if I am proved wrong in some area, or have reasonable doubts, I will try to explain that to you, the readers, too.

Feel free to believe any areas you choose, and reject any you can't accept right now.  Incorporate any of these ideas you like into your own beliefs, or your life's experiences.  I hope that most who read this theory will find it funny, thought provoking, and reasonable.  I accept that many who will read this are too well "trained or taught" in current ideas.  They cannot change their beliefs enough to allow them to shift their thought-processes to experience or appreciate the C-R theory viewpoint.

If the C-R theory helps even one person to understand the workings in our universe in a simpler, better way, or to appreciate the pre-planning and the intricate wisdom of their Creator more, I will accept that.  If it helps you, the individual reader, that is even better.

Sincerely

Jerry A. Reynard

KEYS to look for when viewing the universe:

• Excess Electrons from Every Matter-eating Black-Hole ^C-R.
• Total Positive ionization of remnants from ALL ex-Black-Hole ^C-R phenomenon, novas, supernovas, Seyfert galaxies, quasars, and gamma ray bursts (GRB's)
• Red-shifts outward in ALL directions, blue-shifts only towards the direction of the CENTER of the universe.
• No Big Bang to start-it-all.ABSOLUTELY no dependence on starting conditions or consequences.
• 2.7K radiation value only seen from earth. WILL take on other values far from earth, depending on one’s viewing location in this universe.
• 2.7K WILL NOT red-shift over time.
• ALL conditions seen in this universe are STILL ongoing, at this time!!  We see the universe as it is, at a real-time rate, not DOPPLER shifted!!!
• Objects further-out towards the outer edges are slower than similar objects nearer to here, on earth.
• Objects closer-in to the center are less-slowed-down, (i.e., running faster), than objects here on earth.

Some of the above ARE already apparent when viewing our universe, some will take a long time to verify.If ANY of the above can be proved WRONG, then the C-R theory IS LIKELY to be False.

I welcome any interested reader's suggested links to sites opposing, supporting, or challenging any of the C-R theory concepts. Any links to unnoticed new phenomenon with a possible link to the C-R theory concepts would also be appreciated.

I do understand that some of the ideas I have presented are new, but I still try to use existing language, wherever possible, to convey the concepts. I will try to link to simple diagrams to illustrate the concepts, and compare them to similar, more well-known events. If enough readers comment that they cannot understand the same area, I will revise that section or try to simplify either the concept or the language.

An earlier version of the C-R theory can still be viewed at::

www.geocities.com/recycling_universe

for historical purposes

Thank you for visiting this site.I hope that it has given you new options, and new methods, to understand our home, this universe.

Last revised April, 2008